Sins of Omission
RECENT STORIES IN both dailies declared Minnesota's welfare-to-work pilot program--the basis of the state's welfare reforms--a success. But nowhere in the laudatory articles did either paper mention significant differences between the successful pilot Minnesota Family Investment Project (MFIP), on trial for several years now, and its welfare-reform counterpart (MFIP-S), scheduled to be the norm statewide by next spring. For example, under MFIP individuals develop employability plans, while MFIP-S takes a more cookie-cutter approach and limits training and education opportunities. Also, people can stay on MFIP until their earnings reach 140 percent of the poverty level, but will have to get off MFIP-S at 120 percent, which critics fear will bar families from becoming self-sufficient.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss City Pages' biggest stories.
- Friendship comes at a price for the new Seward co-op
- Lake Elmo's beautiful greensward threatened by disuse and developers
- U of M student Rahsaan Mahadeo awarded, then arrested for his activism