Comment of the Day: Semi-automatics don't kill, people do?
Here's a fact: In 2011, fistfights claimed more lives than rifles in Minnesota. Do with that what you will.
Our post about a gun rights group's allegation that Rep. Ron Erhardt threatened to shoot their president has sparked a heated debate about guns in the comment section.
One argument being trotted out is that since knives and fists are actually involved in more deaths than semi-automatics, politicians should try to ban stabbing and punching before they go after those types of firearms.
Here's how one gun rights supporter makes the case:
We've heard this argument before, but the question remains -- do you find it persuasive? Or, on the other hand, do you think that because there's no good reason to own a semi-automatic in the first place, even a single murder involving one is too many?
Let us know, as always, in the comment section.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss City Pages' biggest stories.
- A terrible Minneapolis park deal just got $2 million worse
Sat., Sep. 19, 12:00am
Sat., Sep. 19, 7:00pm
Sun., Sep. 20, 12:00pm
Sat., Sep. 26, 2:30pm
- Why you should never run over a kid while flying a confederate flag
- Minnesota has eighth most expensive cigarettes