For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.
It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.
How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."
A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.
John Updike
Terrorist
Knopf
The fated showdown of these mismatched souls is the substance of John Updike's Terrorist, a melancholy character study that is also a series of Rothian diatribes and, most shockingly, a nail-biter that builds to a wince-inducing climax. (Would you believe me if I said the last book that accelerated this fast in its last 20 pages was written by Dan Brown?) To be sure, Updike is winking at the New Jersey gripe artist who stole his thunder in the Nineties and Aughts, but the engine for the novel's mighty and cold-blooded wrath is one of Updike's oldest and most powerful forebears: the Protestant ironist Nathaniel Hawthorne. Who but Updike would swap out Hawthorne's pastor's robes for a black, medieval-looking burqa?
Both Ahmad and his counselor (and maybe—can we go out on a limb here?—the author) believe that in a time when commercial values trump all else, Americans have turned into silly, sodden pagans, boozily stubbing their toes as they dance around the Golden Calf. It is High Muslim rigor Ahmad mourns, as Levy grieves old-school blue-state sophistication: Martin Luther King, Jack Benny, coherent full sentences. The difference is that Levy, a failed borscht-belt gag writer, does little with his righteous wrath but bellyache and shtup a MILF. It is the younger man who turns his revulsion and lust for purity into a sword.
Updike's mainline Protestant-turned-Muslim ferocity makes Terrorist the most compulsively readable of his novels since 1990's Rabbit at Rest. Without getting hung up on a taxonomy of brand names, Updike paints a fresco of contemporary suburban New Jersey as an icy whirligig of dead souls. And his immersion in Ahmad's yearning for rigor and discipline gives the novel a Taxi Driver-like momentum that's unique for this writer. (Incidentally, Updike, a lifelong film buff, makes several sly references to films from our Bicentennial—including the exploitation classic Massacre at Central High.)
Is Updike suggesting we deserve to have the big one dropped on us? Not in more than a daydreaming way; his heart is with Levy the ineffectual, Levy the deeply uncool, Levy the last rememberer of decent human behavior. But it is not this pot-bellied Mondale Democrat who gets the last word in Terrorist, but Ahmad.