For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.
It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.
How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."
A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.
But now you're them. You realize that a lot of your life, most of it maybe, has consisted of certain style calibrations in your consumer choices, and then you think, Well, that's unhelpful. There's no more corner bodega to get bottled water from, nor is there a choice of Aquafina, Arrowhead, or Crystal Geyser. You have a certain amount of protein-filled foodstuff and perhaps a few changes of clothes, maybe a week's worth. You don't have gas. All of a sudden, questions pop up that you don't have the resources to answer. How are you going to bargain for food and medicine? How are you going to get on a freight train that might take you to a town where they have fresh water? How are you going to keep your children from being raped?
I have to exhume a long-dead word now: Michael Haneke's Time of the Wolf is a noble film. It's shitty that Pauline Kael and her descendants have killed that word and made it synonymous with worthy and virtuous and good for you, which in turn are synonyms for boring and pleasureless and left-wing puritanical. Haneke's long tenure as a theater director brought him close to the highest moral aspirations of drama making. In brief, he has made a movie that makes you feel as if you yourself, living in the present moment, in a never-named first world country, are those very people on television enduring catastrophe. It is possible to feel, as a spectator whirling in a hypertrophic glut of trauma imagery--the stress disorder of a 24-hour news cycle--that Haneke has reinvented dramatic empathy itself. Time of the Wolf reawakens our moral selves in a way that only a great movie can.
We are shown a mother, father, daughter, and son. They enter a country house bearing food, water, and suitcases. Inside, a lower-class man with a rifle appears with his wife and baby. In a single image, in a few lines of dialogue, whole characters, relationships, the political landscape of an entire world, are drawn with a minimum of means. A death happens--and we are propelled in a direction that we couldn't have imagined. But here's the catch: We think that, at least, we will be given the stability of a cast of characters. Here's the anchor; here's the supporting cast; these are the walk-ons. But Haneke takes even this away from us. As the mother (Isabelle Huppert) is plunged into a wasteland of refugees, she grows more paralyzed and ineffective. She sort of drops by the wayside--as a lot of people do in this film, very literally. Haneke forces you to fend for yourself.