For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.
It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.
How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."
A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.
Kurt and Courtney
Lagoon Cinema, starts Friday
Broomfield gives these ideas a lot of play before casually discounting them in a voiceover. His point, I think, is to implicate Cobain as blameless victim, more acted upon than actor (which, not incidentally, is Grant's mission as well). Cobain's divorce-torn childhood comes in handy here, and Broomfield milks it with tapes of a 2-year-old's giddy singing and stories about Kurt's subsequent teen misery. He wanted to keep his music "pure," remembers Cobain's likeable aunt (but must she expose his shy secrets?). Broomfield tellingly sets the accounts of pre-stardom friends--unpretentious, artless women, every one--against the specter of artful Love, presented in all her main-chancing, Versace-vamping, Hollywood ass-kissing glory.
Broomfield compiles so many anti-Courtney tirades that some critics have felt compelled to defend her. He needn't have stacked his deck: Love reveals her awesome self-interest with every calculated move. (How, asks Broomfield priggishly, could Love prattle with the ACLU about free speech when she's intimidated backers and pulled songs from his documentary? To show the world she has that power, of course!) But the filmmaker's disgust isn't actually directed at Courtney as Courtney: In his film, she signifies Dame Fortune. And according to Broomfield, Fortune killed Cobain, sure as if she (his pronoun, not mine) put the shotgun to his head.
Kurt and Courtney were heading for divorce, declares P.I. Grant: "They had different priorities in life." Hers, apparently, had to do with owning a Lexus; his, with reminiscing about the days when he could only afford to buy one thrift-store item and not the entire thrift store. "Fame," says one perceptive former friend, "is a process of isolation," and his sudden, distancing celebrity clearly bothered Cobain tremendously. But it's more than a little disingenuous to proclaim, as Cobain did and Broomfield does, that the singer didn't work toward his success and to some extent enjoy it. Why is purchasing a Lexus somehow worse than diving into an expensive, soul-numbing drug addiction? Because you can pretend that the latter isn't a choice?
Broomfield interviews a rock writer whose life was threatened by both Love and Cobain. Love's chilling phone message follows. Before we hear Cobain's, which is equally horrid, Broomfield describes how lost and distraught he sounds--the implication being that Love consciously drove him to this evil. Which may be, but doesn't excuse him. It's obviously quite important to Broomfield and his expected audience that Cobain's persona remain that of a sensitive, idealistic "brilliant artist," disheartened and finally fucked--as Guns N' Roses once envisioned--by commerce. The irony is that Kurt and Courtney portrays killer capitalism, that creature of white men's irresponsible avarice, as a manipulative femme fatale.
If Broomfield disappears Cobain's personal and professional accountability, he's no less dishonest about his own ambitions. Even as it documents the crimes of fame and fortune, Kurt and Courtney wearies with its acute thirst for same. Broomfield spotlights himself, Michael Moore style, in a couple of meaningless David-vs.-the-corporate-Godzilla guerrilla raids, hoping to pass as another heroic victim celebrity. At the same time, he mocks the naked need of his interviewees (especially Love's bulldog dad) to prove their existence in the mirror of his lens. By the end, Cobain's face has grown fuzzy: Everyone has really come to this tawdry wake hoping to fill the star's bloody shoes.