Daily Kos: Markos Moulitsas's website changed politics

Netroots Nation comes to Minneapolis

In a faded casino in Las Vegas, venerable New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd zeroed in on a man she'd decided would be the topic of her next column.

The man, a baby-faced political blogger with darting brown eyes, faced a volley of questions from Dowd: What future did he envision for old-school journos like herself? What did he make of the fact that after only two years of blogging at Wonkette, Ana Marie Cox had just landed a gig at Time magazine?

As the man answered each question, Dowd's assistant took notes on a laptop.

Markos Moulitsas, founder of Dailykos.com
courtesy of Kos Media
Markos Moulitsas, founder of Dailykos.com
Howard Dean was the darling of Daily Kos before his ill-advised scream
AP Photo/Paul Sancya
Howard Dean was the darling of Daily Kos before his ill-advised scream

Once satisfied, Dowd whisked down the garishly carpeted hallways and disappeared into a crowd of people wearing orange lanyards marked "YearlyKos Convention."

A short time later, when another reporter asked what it had been like to be the singular focus of the best-selling author and Pulitzer Prize winner's attention, Markos Moulitsas Zúniga was blunt in his assessment.

"Maureen Dowd," Moulitsas said, "is an insecure, catty bitch."

Moulitsas is not the type to mince words. It is his army nickname, "Kos," that is splashed across every balloon, tote bag, and lanyard at the conference, which had grown out of his influential political blog, www.DailyKos.com.

His fellow bloggers weren't there to kiss the ring of old-media celebs; they were checking nametags for the internet handles of fellow Daily Kos comrades: "pontificator," "Meteor Blades," "mcjoan," "dday." Until today, even their most ardent fans had no idea what they looked like.

Despite the crappy hotel, the fact that few of the workshop presenters had ever spoken in public, and the horror of learning at the last minute that the Riviera Casino had no Wi-fi, the event had drawn over 1,000 bloggers from all over the country. The media and politicians followed—Harry Reid delivered the keynote, and by day three, 147 journalists roamed the halls with cameras and microphones.

So it stood to reason that Moulitsas felt ballsy enough to spark a feud with one of the biggest names in the building. It was also his calling card: Many of the Daily Kos regulars who shook his hand for the first time that weekend agreed that "kos" the internet entity and Moulitsas the man were one and the same: acerbic, irascible, unapologetic.

Even five years later, as the sixth annual conference is set to descend on the Minneapolis Convention Center on June 16, Moulitsas expresses few regrets. He should not, he concedes, have called Dowd a "bitch." But, he adds, "she was catty and definitely insecure."

Her problem, Moulitsas argues, and the problem of many of the mainstream media writers who peeked behind the blogosphere curtain for the first time in that Las Vegas casino, was that she was too shortsighted to see the big picture.

"She's threatened," Moulitsas says. "She was trying figure out what her job security was. The political reporters, this was them trying to grapple with how credible and how serious this movement was."


IN 1999, THE YEAR President Bill Clinton faced impeachment, a computer programmer used the word "blog" as a verb for the first time.

It was also the same year that LiveJournal and Blogger went online, giving people with no understanding of computer code the opportunity to create their own online diaries.

In 2001, a week before al Qaeda operatives flew two planes into the Twin Towers, another blogging platform, called Movable Type, flickered to life.

In the ensuing chaos after 9/11, criticism of President Bush fell to a hushed whisper within mainstream media. Meanwhile, a small ecosystem of bloggers began to form online, where they confessed their misgivings about the impending war and general mistrust for the Republicans running the country.

A few of those blogs rose to prominence at a time when a couple of thousand hits per post was still considered a huge success: Talking Points Memo, MyDD, and Atrios. Anonymity was, at the time, a valued commodity.

"It was a time when being vocally liberal tended to really anger people," says Duncan Black, a.k.a. Atrios. "Part of the reason for being anonymous was minor concern for safety."

As the blogs increased in popularity, their influence began to carry over to real life. They began to break news themselves. They raised massive sums for Democratic candidates. They selected their own candidates.

As the bloggers became increasingly organized, the new kingmakers sought to push their progressive agenda—to elect, as Moulitsas likes to say, "more and better Democrats." This special brand of loosely organized, internet-centric activism became known as the "netroots."

"They challenged the party with not only new ways of doing politics but new people demanding participation in politics," says Jay Rosen, a professor at the Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute at New York University. "It altered the number of people you have to pay attention to, and that was a very important thing. Now we take it for granted."


WHEN MOULITSAS WAS A nine-year-old boy living in civil war-torn El Salvador, his parents received a strange envelope in the mail.

Inside were photos of Moulitsas and his brother being driven to their grandmother's, and getting on and off the school bus.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help

Markos Moulitsas is connected to the CIA having trained with them during the time he was writing his blog. This is factual information found on the internet and there is a recording of Moulitsas talking about his involvement with the CIA.

He is NOT a "progressive".

Jeffrey Kline
Jeffrey Kline

Those of us who do not believe in liberal socialism are watching this carefully because some of the followers have been known to be rather radical. One of the beauties of a truly free society is the ability to express one's mind and thoughts. Even if they are contrary politically to the standard norm. There always is the rule of thought that if you do not like this way of life, and would rather live under a socialist, Marxist, communist or totalitarian government system, you are free to move elsewhere. We in America plan on keeping things as they are despite the wishes of a few strange liberals and the Islamic fundamentalists who want to bring Sharia law here.

Michelle Bachmann
Michelle Bachmann

Please please don't be shy Jeffrey. You cite the absolute 100% seriousness of the danger of Sharia law but you don't cite any examples. Please give one example of Sharia law and how it has affected you. I know in Minnesota Gov. Pawlenty passed several Sharia laws but I can't think of one. Can you please for the love of God just cite one that has passed in the past 10 years? I'm sure it will be easy since its such a clear and present danger to the United States. Please just one example to prove the clear thinking of Tea Party people.


So...let me see if I have this right.

We are free to have and express whatever political opinions we want. And if our political opinions are contrary to (what you consider) the norm, we should leave.

A well-functioning political system should invite thoughts and opinions from across the spectrum--liberal socialist to right-wing conservative and everywhere in between. How can you call yourself an American and not see this fundamental backbone of our political landscape? When you start excluding people based on what you deem "radical," where do you stop drawing the line?