Top

news

Stories

 

Jeff Larson used RNC piggy bank to pay friends

Did use of charitable donations violate federal election law?

In early 2009, Dino continued to perform about 10 hours of work a week related to the committee, he says, though he was no longer being paid a salary. Most of the work at this point was done by the committee's accountant, who prepared for the FEC audit.

The committee's plan was to settle all debts and close out as soon as possible, says Dino. "We wanted to have everything pretty much closed out in 2009."

As the CEO and treasurer of the committee, Jeff Larson was paid $400,000 after the convention
AP Images/Jim Mone
As the CEO and treasurer of the committee, Jeff Larson was paid $400,000 after the convention

Details

Related Content

More About

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy

But Larson and his committee would take a different path.

  

ON July 21, 2009, the RNC committee held a private meeting. Over coffee, they discussed which charities to support with its surplus.

"We ended up with money left over at the end," says committee chairman Douglas Leatherdale. "And that had to go to another charitable organization, not to the political party or any individuals."

It was agreed that the money would be donated to the Minneapolis Foundation, the St. Paul Foundation, and the Minnesota Foundation.

The other item on the day's agenda was Jeff Larson's compensation. Larson briefly stepped out of the room while the board discussed how much he would be paid. By the time he came back in, the board had voted unanimously to award him $400,000.

This would be the last time the committee would meet in person. From here on, complete control of the finances would be handed to Larson.

A couple of other obstacles prevented a speedy termination for the committee. For one, it was being sued by 3 Dog Consulting, which claimed it was still owed money for convention fundraising work.

The committee was also still preparing for the FEC audit, a thorough review of fundraising and spending. But the audit only looked at spending through December 31, 2008. Beyond that date, Larson's committee racked up large expenses that benefitted companies and individuals close to Larson, according to FEC records.

No one did better than Mike Vallante. Larson's chief of staff on the committee, Vallante received regular salary disbursements of $10,000 from the committee throughout 2009. He also expensed car rental, gas, meals, flights, and other unexplained reimbursements. Combined, Vallante's salary and benefits for that year totaled more than $130,000.

While Vallante pocketed the most money, he was not alone in receiving pay long after the convention, according to FEC records. Joining him was Matt Burns, another staff member of the committee. Burns received $7,500 in June 2009 for consulting. Compelem Strategies, a communications firm he started that month, received another $6,500.

Burns initially declined to comment, but later sent an emailed response.

"My work involved helping the host committee with post-convention survey activities (measuring economic impact of hosting the convention, etc.)," wrote Burns. "My fee for this work was entirely consistent with industry standards and what other clients were charged for similar projects."

Kiersten Schroeder, a committee staff member, was also paid for organizing a thank-you event on the one-year anniversary of the convention at the Radisson. She personally received a $7,500 consulting fee for planning the party. Out of the committee's bank account, the party ran up $25,000 on food and drinks. Another $11,000 went to an ad agency for costs related to the party. (Schroeder did not respond to requests for an interview.)

Another beneficiary is Dan Puhl, founder of Cardinals FEC Compliance, a local accounting firm that specializes in campaign accounting. According to IRS documents, Puhl did the committee's 2009 taxes for free, which the committee listed as an $79,865 in-kind donation. But Puhl has since received more than $13,000 for accounting and tax consulting.

Puhl's firm has also enjoyed the rewards: Cardinals has been paid more than $116,000 since the beginning of 2009 to compile the committee's quarterly reports.

Puhl says he does his business in private, and would offer neither comment nor explanation for how he made so much money long after the RNC left town.

Another series of expenditures went to political operatives, including a couple of Larson's old friends. Thomas McGill and Richard Nelson, who have worked as fundraisers for Norm Coleman's Northstar Leadership PAC—which Larson founded, and has managed since 2003—were paid a combined $40,500 for "donor relations."

In March 2010, the committee paid another $25,000 to Laura Van Hove, founder of LVH Consulting, also for donor analysis. According to LVH's website, its mission is "to aid principled Republican candidates in their campaigns by helping them reach their full national fundraising potential."

Both McGill and Van Hove declined to comment on the record about their work for the committee.

Nearly $40,000 of the committee's money also found its way back to Larson's firm, FLS. Throughout 2009 and 2010, FLS charged the committee for administrative fees, telephone and IT service, and rent. The last payment of $1,800, filed September 29, 2010, was described as "IT and Rent for June."

John Knapp, an attorney with local firm Winthrop and Weinstine, represented the committee in its lawsuit and dealings with the FEC. He says the first half of 2010 was spent waiting for the FEC's audit, which was finished and published in the third week in June.

"You look back in the past year, and we really haven't done much of anything except for wait for the FEC," Knapp says.

During the wait, Vallante continued to cash checks. Though his reimbursements dropped off, Vallante continued collecting a salary during 2010. He pocketed a combined $106,000—of which $32,000 came in payments on June 22, 29, and 30, in the days immediately before and after the FEC audit was finalized.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page >>
 
  • Riman12345 07/11/2011 4:38:00 AM

    Did anyone realize Mike Vallante works side by side with Jeff? He is Chief of Staff to RNC. They both are.

  • Radioheadline 04/13/2011 4:10:00 AM

    Agreed, CP Editor in Chief sucks

  • Horacewidmer 03/22/2011 2:37:00 PM

    I think the difference between how the two parties wrapped up their convention was very telling. As the new president begins to push his controversial programs and the nation's lower class forms a new - tea - party, over in the corner that no one is watching is a man stuffing his pockets. Get while the getting's good, I suppose.

  • Ere 03/19/2011 9:59:00 PM

    I got in to one of the ridiculous RNC private parties where Smashmouth was doing covers of Van Halen songs on a small staged propped up at Aqua. Don't fucking tell me that was paid by taxpayers. Although, seeing fat, sweaty, drunk and confused corporate types wearing suits dancing and singing to Runnin' with the Devil and awkwardly hitting on gold diggers might have been worth it.

  • 03/17/2011 8:39:00 AM

    Sure would be nice if their was a story here instead of the usual partisan CP muckraking. The Dems spent 5.3 million just to erect Barackopolis at the DNC to feed "the one's" ego. What difference does it make how either party decides to waste it, I believe that's why they call it a donation. Will all of the media outlets who rushed to expose the $150,000 wardrobe cost for a middle-class VP candidate report on the millions spent to feed Barack Obama’s grandeur? Keep in mind, who got the bigger bang for the buck?

  • 03/16/2011 10:20:00 PM

    So Democrats wrapped up their convention for one-eighth of what Republicans spent/gave their buddies? Which is the party that can't handle money?

  • Guest 03/16/2011 3:38:00 PM

    This piece is VERY unprofessional by journalistic standards. There are multiple spelling errors. Did the authors, Andy Mannix and Mike Mullen fail to edit this piece? They refer to one of their main targets in the story, Mike Vallante, as both "Vallante" and "Vallente". Come on guys, how are readers supposed to take this piece seriously when you pay such little attention to the details that SHOULDN'T matter, i.e. misspelling the last name of one of the main characters of the piece? Maybe it's not Mannix and Mullen's fault...maybe the editors at CityPages are the hacks? However, this piece also misspells country musician, John Rich's first name as "Jon". My feeling is that such inattention to details, whether it is the result of laziness or stupidity, probably transfers to some of the major substantive details that you are both trying to make. Poor job.

  • 03/16/2011 12:49:00 PM

    Wow, shades of Tony Sutton's time as RPM treasurer! God helps those who help themselves, eh?

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy