Top

news

Stories

 

Nick Coleman dumped by St. John's

Star Tribune columnist was too offensive

Nick Coleman was making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for his three boys when the mail arrived. He was distracted, fussing in his mind about a looming deadline on his Star Tribune column, when he opened the letter from St. John's University.

It was the school's version of a pink slip.

The message was eloquently written, but crystal clear. For one year now, Coleman had been a senior fellow at the school's Eugene J. McCarthy Center for Public Policy & Civic Engagement. He'd tacked his title onto his opinion columns in the Star Tribune each Sunday. Now the school wanted him gone.

Budget challenges had caused the school to reconsider the fellows program, wrote Joe DesJardins, the school's vice provost. But the real reason for Coleman's ouster was spelled out in DesJardins's carefully chosen next words.

"Unfortunately, many of our alumni and friends interpreted your by-line as a Senior Fellow of the McCarthy Center as an implicit SJU endorsement of the opinions you express," DesJardins wrote. "This has brought St. John's into the political sphere in ways that we had not anticipated and think is not in St. John's best long-term interest."

Coleman had been delighted when the university asked him to be the center's first fellow. He was proud to be associated with McCarthy, the former congressman and presidential candidate known for his outspoken opposition to the Vietnam War.

To Coleman, DesJardins's letter was a cop-out. "It's not like I just fell off the turnip truck," he says. "I've been writing opinion columns for years."

Coleman quickly scanned the center's website. The lecture series named after Mark Kennedy, the former Republican state senator and staunch pro-lifer, was still prominently associated with the school.

"I do think something is out of whack when he's a part of it and a liberal columnist can't be," Coleman says of Kennedy.

What Coleman didn't know was that efforts to unseat him from St. John's had been brewing for months.

Bob Labat, a 1959 St. John's grad who has donated to the school every year since, noticed Coleman's columns right away. Labat found Coleman grating—a quality he considered inappropriate for someone associated with the Catholic school.

"He has every right to be as caustic and as strong in his opinion as he wants to be, but when you're also writing on the masthead of an academic institution, that's a problem," Labat says.

He wasn't alone. In September, Len Busch, who has given $20,000 to the St. John's theology department each of the last three years, authored a handwritten message about Coleman.

"As long as St. John's has this man on the payroll, I will no longer give my money to St. John's," Busch wrote. "I will not support lies and false statements and half truths about anyone."

Busch called the dean of the theology school, Bill Cahoy, and asked him to set up a lunch with Coleman. In the meantime, Busch compiled a stack of Coleman's columns he found objectionable.

He hated the December 5 column, which criticized 3M after company execs asked employees to send letters to Congress about health care reform.

"You've got a company, if the company doesn't exist, the workers don't get a damn thing," Busch says. "They don't have a job, they don't have anything. This anti-corporation is terrible. They provide jobs. They provide everything. And someone takes their money and invests in them—but let's badmouth the hell out of any corporation. Well, that's stupid."

Busch was similarly offended by Coleman's February columns, which criticized Gov. Tim Pawlenty for abandoning Minnesota to travel the country to further his presidential ambitions.

"His tone is negative, negative, negative, negative," Busch says of Coleman.

On May 4, Busch got his showdown with his adversary. He was in his backyard when his wife came out and told him someone from St. John's was on the line: Coleman would meet him for lunch in Maple Grove—in 20 minutes.

Busch was in such a rush that he had no time to call and invite Labat, who had wanted to come along. "I thought that was very, very rude," Busch says. "I had all these articles laying here, and I couldn't even bring anything along."

Cahoy, the theology dean, joined Coleman and Busch for lunch. On the way into the restaurant, Cahoy told Busch what was in store for Coleman: "I believe he's on the way out," Cahoy said.

Coleman and Busch ordered salads and Busch started in with his criticism. Busch told Coleman that the information in his columns was slanted and false. He was particularly focused on a column in which Coleman said the rich should pay more taxes.

"What else are you but a damn liar?" Busch asked Coleman.

"You can't just say I'm a liar," Coleman replied.

The lunch only went downhill after that.

"He was very livid—very, very livid," Coleman recalls.

"I thought he was damn rude," Busch says.

On July 19, Coleman got the letter from DesJardins dismissing him as a fellow. No one from St. John's had bothered to talk to him about it. St. John's also declined to talk to City Pages. Instead, the university issued this brief statement:

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • shar 08/28/2010 9:42:00 PM

    Good judgement on the part of St. John's.

  • M Landers 08/23/2010 10:39:00 PM

    I don't always agree with Coleman's point of view. He is too far to the left for me. That being said, I enjoy reading him for that reason. I don't have much interest in reading columns of conservatives who think like me. I already know what I think and why. I like to hear from different points of view so that I can understand what they think and why. I understand that many people don't agree with Coleman, but I don't understand why people want his point of view silenced because it differs from theirs. Is that really what America is about? Let those with money speak and those without shut up. As for St. John's, I am ashamed and embarrassed. Colleges should represent more than a good football program.

  • Dave Roy 08/23/2010 7:35:00 AM

    Wow! I am so proud of my fellow SJU alumni in helping this hack get the boot. I stopped my fellow contributions because of his association. I just wish we could have found a way to get connected more quickly. I saw that his byline today in the Strib didn't connect to SJU. What a blessing finally!

  • A Madison 08/23/2010 4:37:00 AM

    I have felt Coleman should have hung up his pointed pencil years ago. It became depressing to read his ongoing critical rantings-never seeming to get past his hate of the governor. And he cites his religious background and upbringing??????? I can understand clearly that St. Johns exercised it's rights to give Coleman a boot in the ass. I haven't yet-but now will considering donating to St. Johns. And for Coleman, maybe he should find an organization that espouses the same whining, complaining liberal rubbish that he does.

  • Bobby King 08/11/2010 12:49:00 AM

    These quotes from Len Busch show him to be the kind of “Fox News” Republican that believes any criticism of corporate America is unacceptable and that all wealth flows from corporations. He says in the article, “You’ve got a company. If the company doesn’t exist, the workers don’t get a damn thing….They provide jobs. They provide everything.” One of our greatest presidents and by far the greatest Republican president said "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration." Rather than ask for an equal opportunity to air his opinion through the McCarthy Center Bush wants to silence opinions opposed to his. This is contrary to the Center’s goal which it describes in part as “In this day and age of "Crossfire" political reasoning and us/them political rhetoric, many young people are unfortunately steering away from political engagement. As a result, the faculty and core group of students from the Center work diligently to create venues for constructive, responsible and interesting civic debate and engagement in community affairs.” What was this about ultimately? It seem clear that SJU was kowtowing to wealthy conservative donors who want to win an argument by squelching debate. Nothing could be less democratic or more harmful to higher education.

  • Mike Erlandson 08/09/2010 10:06:00 PM

    I have seen firsthand the McCarthy Center (and SJU/CSB) do a great job of fostering the kind of thinking we should all support. It helps develop future leaders while challenging us all to think about important issues facing our nation, state and the world without a political bend. That is evident by the fact Nick was a fellow at the Center. SJU has always fostered "community." That community is not driven by any one issue, fellow, school leader/donor or student, but rather a collection of them all. I don't agree anymore with every school policy then I agree with every word written by Nick Coleman, but let us not believe for a minute the school made this decision based on what Nick wrote or a donor said. Programs make changes and I am sure an un-gagged Nick and un-wavering Center will both continue to challenge us to think critically about, and engage in, the many public policy debates taking place around us daily.

  • 08/08/2010 6:57:00 PM

    The firing of Nick Coleman is another perfect example of how the Catholic church has become entirely dependent on financial contributions to the exclusion of ethical, moral and fairness issues. Protecting pedophile priests and attacking liberalism seems to be the Church's main contribution to public discourse these days.

  • sodakker 08/07/2010 11:04:00 AM

    When Nick Coleman's dad had influence over state spending as a powerful state senator, he very overtly tried to strong-arm local elected officials to find job for Nick, Jr. who was unable to land a job out of college. The officials did not capitulate and Nick, Jr. decided the alternative was to go to work for his step-mom and become a journalist. Nick should be more empathetic with big donor concerns.

  • God 08/06/2010 10:31:00 PM

    Nick is a dick.

  • Disgruntled 08/06/2010 6:52:00 PM

    Just another example of how St. John's is steadily going downhill. I went there and I used to think that St. John's was the only bastion of rational,liberal thought in the Catholic world (something desperately needed since PJPII), but the school is becoming more regressive, and more expensive, by the year. One thing is for certain...none of my kids are going there and they will never get a dime from me for the alumni fund.

  • zipity 08/06/2010 5:57:00 PM

    I have no doubt that those here who have their panties in bunch due to the "trampling" of Nick Coleman's right to free speech would and have had no trouble with the scandalous behavior of Liberal students and activists who routinely shout down and threaten with violence conservative speakers brought to campus by conservative student groups in numerous places around this country. Diversity of opinion, my ass. 90% of the colleges/universities are thoroughly and completely controlled by very Liberal administrations and faculty that crush any and all vestiges of conservative thought.

  • Phil Ledermann 08/06/2010 5:55:00 AM

    #To tkavanag 08/05/2010 12:14:16 PM "Phil Ledermann 08/04/2010 2:42:43 PM I matriculated at St. John's for 8 years in the late sixties." How could you have been at SJ for *8* years in the late '60s without being drafted after 4? I spent 4 years at St. John's Prep and 4 years at SJU. To Anna 08/05/2010 2:50:37 PM recent grad of CSB who writes..." I met Nick Coleman a number of times and am sad to see the falling out of his departure - he was given the opportunity to exit gracefully when his contract was not renewed (he was not fired) and instead chose to go whining to the City Pages. The College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University are not afraid of flack from donors of any political stripe - don't think that Nick Coleman is the first political persona to attract less than favorable reactions from wealthy donors. The two schools foster a diverse political dialogue on campus - as evidenced by the wide variety of speakers you'll see on the McCarthy Center's website...." I have to differ from your conclusions! What evidence do you present that the colleges are not afraid of flack from donors. When in fact, according to the article they are dropping Coleman because some wealthy person doesn't like him. You state, that the decision ..."does not hurt or benefit students in any way...." I would submit that an institution that has integrity stands by its principles even in the face of hardship or controversy. Not doing so, models situational ethics and weak leadership. This, as I submitted in my earlier post, is what has been plaguing St. John's in the last several decades: A lack of value driven visionary leadership. That indeed does damaged and hurt students who are being trained to be future leadership. Thanks for listening. PL

  • Anna 08/06/2010 2:50:00 AM

    I am a recent graduate of the College of Saint Benedict and was very closely involved with the McCarthy Center throughout my four years on campus. I'm going with Jon on this one, anyone who actually knows the campus or has been a student there in the past few years can tell you that the political dialogue on campus is incredibly dynamic thanks, in large part, to the work of the McCarthy Center under the leadership of Matt Lindstrom. I met Nick Coleman a number of times and am sad to see the falling out of his departure - he was given the opportunity to exit gracefully when his contract was not renewed (he was not fired) and instead chose to go whining to the City Pages. The College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University are not afraid of flack from donors of any political stripe - don't think that Nick Coleman is the first political persona to attract less than favorable reactions from wealthy donors. The two schools foster a diverse political dialogue on campus - as evidenced by the wide variety of speakers you'll see on the McCarthy Center's website. As institutions of higher learning CSB/SJU are most concerned to do what is best for students. This is the job of a higher ed institution after all. The school's decision not to renew Nick Coleman's contract for this academic year does not hurt or benefit students in any way. Jim, your decision to discourage your children from attending such wonderful institutions is nearsighted and poorly informed. The fact that one man's PB&J was soured by the news that he would no longer have the privilege of holding the title Senior Fellow of the Eugene J. McCarthy Center for Public Policy and Civic Engagement is not grounds for you to deny your children a world class education at two incredibly dynamic institutions where, no doubt, their minds will not be shielded or sheltered from the complex political realities of today.

  • MNSerious 08/06/2010 2:36:00 AM

    Withholding money from institutions that offend your sensibilities is logical and often effective, whether it's boycotting Target or these donors refusing to donate to St. John's. But this situation does point out two things: 1. Educational institutions need to include many viewpoints or they don't fulfill their purpose, and donors who get it the way of that are hurting the institutions they purport to help. 2. Rich people have a much easier time shaping the public conversation than the rest of us. A successful public boycott is difficult to organize and rarely works. Catering to the whims of millionaires is standard practice in our institutions. Political equality is only as real as economic equality, and that has been on the retreat for thirty years.

  • Jim 08/06/2010 2:08:00 AM

    Well, I toured St. John's last summer with one of my sons, and we were very impressed. However, this article kills any chance of me ever sending any of my sons to St. John's. In fact, I also plan to talk to my daughter tonight. She had her heart set on going to St. Benedict's, but I don't want her in this environment. I, personally, don't care for Coleman's columns and his opinions, but they are his "opinions" and he a right to them. This Busch jerk thinks that if he doesn't agree with an opinion, it's false and a lie. It's America-haters like Busch who are weakening the foundation of our nation by chipping away at the ver principles that led to the founding of this once-great nation.

  • Augustus Mulliner 08/06/2010 12:24:00 AM

    Nick Coleman has not had his rights violated, and St. John's is perfectly entitled to yank his appointment. Still, I'd never thought you could put a price on the unfettered flow of ideas and opinions. Apparently St. John's has, and it's $20,000 a year.

  • tkavanag 08/06/2010 12:14:00 AM

    "Phil Ledermann 08/04/2010 2:42:43 PM I matriculated at St. John's for 8 years in the late sixties." How could you have been at SJ for *8* years in the late '60s without being drafted after 4?

  • Minjinl 08/05/2010 8:27:00 PM

    Oh well. It's easy enough to rename it the Joseph Raymond McCarthy center - and maybe that would be a blessing. Gene McCarthy is got to be rolling in his grave on this one.

  • Linda 08/05/2010 8:26:00 PM

    Mark Kennedy was never a state senator. He was a member of Congress.

  • Howard huber 08/05/2010 6:07:00 AM

    Wow. I thought St. Johns would end up best known for hiding pedophiliac monks and priests. But maybe the asshole booster / craven administration angle will crowd that news out for awhile.

  • Johnnie 08/05/2010 3:00:00 AM

    Let's all pretend like the biology department all got canned for teaching evolution. +1 alumnus who feels neither insulated nor isolated.

  • Phil Ledermann 08/05/2010 2:42:00 AM

    I matriculated at St. John's for 8 years in the late sixties. I cam to be proud of the Johnnie tradition as church leadership, high academics, and a welcoming spirit. Speakers were invited to the campus from all points of view. St. John's knew that their job as teachers was not to tell us what to think bit rather how to think wholistically with the mind, the body, and the spirit. I always saw St. Thomas as the school that sold out its soul for big money. The Ratpack cheers of ..."Johnnie Rejects..." at a contest between SJU and STC reflected that comparative value as students who couldn't make it at St. John's despite daddy's money were welcomed with open arms and with palms upturned at St. Thomas (Witness O'Shaunesy Hall, etc..). More recently, St. Thomas banned a speaker on campus because the church leadership disagreed with the speaker. Over the years, St. John's leadership in the world-wide church was bold and certainly not supported by the masses. Yet St. John's scholars led where their scholarship and prophecy took them. Some thing has happened along the way. The tremendous bungled handling of the sex scandals, the failure to see the need for leadership in the world and church regarding the changing role of men in society and on and on.... Now we see evidence of being bought off and blackmailed by money. I don't have enough money to change the course of history at St. John's. I only wish it would set its sail back to encouraging the pursuit of truth, challenging one's beliefs to make them stronger and not damping down presentations because they are not in agreement. Thank you.

  • StribSucks 08/05/2010 2:06:00 AM

    Love the picture Nick. Only thing missing was duct tape over your eyes and nose. Let me know if you need some help with that....

  • zipity 08/05/2010 2:04:00 AM

    Dave is right. I think St. Johns should refuse to take any more money from conservative alums. That will teach them. Bastards....

  • dave 08/05/2010 1:34:00 AM

    I don't care how old this Busch guy is, he's a moron. He needs to go back to St. John's and re-take freshman comp.

  • zipity 08/05/2010 12:28:00 AM

    Paul said: "Yes, this guy was not arrested by the authorities and thrown into the Gulag. But if being arrested is your definition of the chilling of free speech, you are in for a real treat, the world is going your way." And yet I bet you are OK with Target being boycotted because you disagree with their political donations. Tell me, is it a problem for you that Unions in Minnesota donate virtually in lock-step hundreds of millions of dollars to only the Democratic party in this state? Of course, they are only exercising their right to free speech, yes? But Target and the gentleman you denigrate in your scribblings? "Free speech for me, but not for thee" seems to be the Liberal mantra in this country.

  • zipity 08/04/2010 11:43:00 PM

    Paul said: "Who reads this paper anyway? " Paul said: "What, did I name-drop some new band just written up on Pitchfork?" Heh. I think you just answered your own question. Now Nick isn't having his rights violated, instead his free speech has been chilled? Whatever. As for staying on topic, how is having a one year contract not renewed a "firing"? It could be that St. Johns just felt they weren't getting their moneys-worth from employing Little Nicky. God knows that's how I felt when I used to buy the StarTribune and read his columns. And but of course, you feel the only ones that should face consequences for what they say/write/do are conservatives, right? Too predictable.

  • Swiftee 08/04/2010 11:07:00 PM

    Couldn't have happened to a more deserving moonbat. I wonder if Nick-boy believes Randi Reitan and "the Uptake" blackmailed Target with their street theater protest. In case you're wondering, yes, that was a rhetorical question. The larger question is what effect will Nick's appearance on the unemployent rolls have on the extension battle going on in Congress. Is it fair to cut thousands off just to teach one leftist dolt a lesson?

  • Paul Scott 08/04/2010 10:49:00 PM

    Zip, zip, zip. Hipster? What, did I name-drop some new band just written up on Pitchfork? Please stay on topic. One more try: A guy is let go by his employer after a reader with money and right wing leanings complains about a column. Yes, this guy was not arrested by the authorities and thrown into the Gulag. But if being arrested is your definition of the chilling of free speech, you are in for a real treat, the world is going your way.

  • zipity 08/04/2010 10:22:00 PM

    Sorry, didn't realize this paper was solely for "hipsters" like you Pauly. And as for the violation of his "free speech". Really? Are you saying that Nick was fired by Congress? The relevant right you are talking about says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Wow. I had no idea Nick was so important that Congress stepped in here and had Nick dismissed. Finally, can you show me where exactly anyone can prove poor Little Nicky was "fired". Oh. Silly me. Facts are not a Liberal strong suite. Cheers.

  • paul Scott 08/04/2010 10:21:00 PM

    Zip, please refrain from watching any Tim Conway sketches on Carol Burnett show reruns, they are just filled with hate for seniors. and no one is saying the um, elderly alum has to keep giving his money. just that the university should not cave to the demand. it is really impossible to argue with someone who can't follow the issue.

  • zipity 08/04/2010 10:08:00 PM

    I see. As long as the target of your hate has money, and is old, then it is okay. Good to know. And yes, we all know "hate speech" is only defined by good Liberals. Kind of like in Alice in Wonderland. "When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less." As for the alumnus's "power", why should he be obligated to give his money to an institution who holds him in such contempt, they pay someone to disparage him? Would you as a Liberal, continue to give money to an institution that gave a fellowship to a hard right Conservative, who then proceeded to produce columns vilifying you? Don't bother replying, we all know the answer to that one....

  • paul Scott 08/04/2010 10:04:00 PM

    BTW Zipity, what makes a guy rush to the defense of someone being fired for exercising their right to free speech? Do you have any idea the company you are now keeping? and then, faking shock -- oh, tho horrors! -- over a joke about dentures? Dentures! That's like, straight out of I Love Lucy. Who reads this paper anyway?

  • Paul Scott 08/04/2010 9:40:00 PM

    Hate speech? Do you even know what hate speech is? Yes, I am viciously attacking all elderly people -- which I may well be, for all you know -- as part of a concerted effort to keep them under the boot of society. Or am I laughing at the comic stupidity of St. John's? At the outsize power of a graduate from 1902, here in 2010. In case you didn't see, the senior in this tale is hardly a put-upon minority. The senior has all the power in this issue. Next.

  • zipity 08/04/2010 9:29:00 PM

    Wow Paul, wouldn't your disparaging of older alums qualify as hate-speech in your politically correct universe if the subject you were excoriating was a minority, female, or person of color? Funny how some of the most judgmental, intolerant, nasty folks I encounter consider themselves to be beacons of tolerance and equality. But being Liberal means never having to apologize for hate-speech....

  • Paul Scott 08/04/2010 9:08:00 PM

    Nick Coleman is tame. I like him, but if his entirely relevant, fact based columns are giving some alum from 1912 the vapors, causing him to drop his dentures into the salad while rushing to the defense of some poor put upon GINORMOUS FORTUNE 500 company, he is doing his job. I can't believe how many morons are commenting on this site in defense of the reactionary douchebags and the cowardly (new!) Catholic university.

  • zipity 08/04/2010 8:13:00 PM

    Well, in Coleman's defense, he's never let facts get in the way of the Ultra-Liberal narrative he's been a water carrier for lo these many years. So...there's that.

  • Sparky 08/04/2010 7:58:00 PM

    There is a big difference between not having a contract or fellowship renewed at end of term and being fired. Well, the difference is that one lets Nick generate headlines for himself, the other lets him fade into the woodwork. Seeing as how Nick is such a big fan of the entitlement/plantation economy, it's only natural that he would holler about not having his fellowship renewed.

  • Jon 08/04/2010 8:13:00 AM

    I think anyone who's been around the McCarthy Center knows that it's very open and inclusive of people of all political stripes. According to the university, Coleman's one-year contract was fulfilled (i.e. there were no "pink slips" involved at all). Maybe there were other reasons St. John's chose to take a break from the Senior Fellows program.

  • Tom 08/04/2010 5:02:00 AM

    I'm a Johnnie, too. I think the actions of the alums who forced out Coleman is despicable, and the actions of the administration that caved in to these alums is embarrassing. I don't have the money that these alums have, but I won't be anxious to hand over any of it next time I see a (320) 363- ____ on the caller ID. And, do they REALLY have something named after Mark Kennedy????

  • sw mn guy 08/04/2010 4:27:00 AM

    If private, religious educational institutions like St. John's continue to isolate and insulate themselves to keep the big money from ever having to hear a contrary opinion, they will soon become irrelevant in contemporary society. You'd think an institution of the Catholic Church would have figured that out by now, but if there's any of Man's creations that can be blind and stupid, it's a hierarchical institution dependent on money.

  • Stonewall Jackson 08/04/2010 4:09:00 AM

    Says Nick Coleman: "In my judgment, that is an unfortunate and unforgivable error." Says me: In my judgment, Nick Coleman can dish it out but he sure can't take it.

  • Johnnie 08/04/2010 3:19:00 AM

    Wonderful photo of a notional Nick. Too bad it was staged and not self-inflicted.

  • Jeffrey Bragg 08/04/2010 2:34:00 AM

    Well, it seems that Mr Busch is a good example of "just because you have money, doesn't make you smart". I guess those 3M workers should be thanking the lord every morning that they have a job...or wait, maybe 3M should be thanking the lord that they had employees that showed up everyday, because it would be hard to make scotchguard without any employees! i guess he feels like workers "owe" something to management.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy