Top

news

Stories

 

Testing Minnesota's gun show loophole

How easy is it to buy a firearm in the Twin Cities?

"If there's an unequivocal opposite to growing up around guns," says Andrew Rothman, "it's being raised by New York Jews." He puts down his glass of water and wipes his dark goatee with a napkin. It would be quite the outlandish statement were he not talking about himself.

"I grew up believing guns were bad," he continues. "That's what my parents taught me. But they also taught me to read. That was their first mistake."

Rothman is the executive director of the Minnesota Association of Defensive Firearm Instructors. Before you can get a permit to carry, you have to take a handgun class taught by a guy like him.

He doesn't fit central casting's stereotype of gun nut. Nor do his three companions for dinner tonight at a St. Paul restaurant. One is a retired attorney, another a law professor, a third a retired business consultant. Everyone at the table is packing.

The quartet form the core of the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, a gun rights lobbyist group that successfully spearheaded a 2003 bill that made Minnesota a "shall issue" state. The legislation stripped local sheriffs of the authority to deny permits to carry at their whim and led to an explosion in the number of permits that continues to this day. In 2008, about 50,000 Minnesotans had permits to carry firearms. Two years later, that number's up to 72,685, which, as gun advocates are quick to point out, coincides with a decrease in violent crime across the state—though that hasn't quieted the critics.

"They want to turn their hysterical fantasy into your current reality," says Hamline Law professor Joe Olson, the group's president and the face of gun rights in Minnesota. "It's a moral campaign for these guys. It grew of the temperance campaign in the '20s, which makes it impossible to talk rationally."

By "they," Olson means Citizens for a Safer Minnesota, whose counteroffensive in recent months has rankled the state's gun-rights activists, specifically the group's efforts to close Minnesota's "gun show loophole," which allows individuals to buy and sell firearms without a background check.

"This is our number-one priority right now," says Joan Peterson, a Duluth resident who sits on the board of Citizens for a Safer Minnesota and the national Brady Campaign. "As it stands, violent criminals can go to these shows and buy several weapons with no oversight."

She found a sympathetic ear in state representative Michael Paymar, who in March introduced a bill that would require background checks for all private sales at gun shows across the state.

Outrage ensued. The National Rifle Association directed members to call and email Paymar. "I received messages calling me 'un-American,' 'communist,' you name it," says Paymar. "The tone was actually scary." The Paymar Bill, as it came to be known, died in committee, though Paymar vows to reintroduce it at some point.

Paymar has never fired a handgun, nor has he ever attended a gun show. He was moved to act, he says, after seeing a YouTube clip. In it, Colin Goddard, a Virginia Tech massacre survivor who was shot four times, attends gun shows and successfully buys firearms without undergoing a background check or even being asked to show identification.

So I decided to try to buy a gun. To hear the Citizens for a Safer Minnesota tell it, this would be an easy task. I didn't have a permit, but surely these gun merchants would insist I purchase their wares, federal red tape be damned. I might even enjoy it.

"There's something about actually shooting a gun that shows 'em the light," says John Caile, a jack-o-lantern-grinning firearms instructor and board member of the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, whose devotion to the gun stemmed from a Warehouse District mugging in 1995. "Heck, you might even want a permit to carry yourself!"

ON A DECEPTIVELY CHILLY, sunlit morning, dozens of gun enthusiasts file into the barnlike confines of National Guard Armory in West St. Paul. Two junior high kids sitting behind a desk accept the five-dollar entry fee like boosters at a high school basketball game.

Once inside the dilapidated gymnasium, visitors are greeted by a maze of 50 booths on which lay a smorgasbord of mostly guns, but also glistening knives of infinite shapes and sizes, samurai swords resting horizontally on wooden racks, and throwing stars arranged in menacing, angular bouquets.

Shuffling along the concrete floor, more than 70 customers peruse the wares like dehydrated joggers examining a convenience-store cooler. The vendors—invariably morose and wary-eyed—don't say much to passersby other than the occasional, robotic "how ya doing." An unspoken etiquette seems to dictate that vendors don't initiate conversation until a prospective buyer pauses for at least 10 seconds at a given display.

"Interested in anything in particular?" asks a suddenly sprung-to-life salesman, his eyes swimming behind thick rectangular spectacles. "Anything you need, we got."

On the table before him lay 28 handguns arranged by caliber. The .22s sit to the left, followed by, in ascending order of size, .38s, 9 millimeters, .40s, and 44s, with a pristine stainless steel .45 Colt revolver priced at $399 at the far end. Four six-foot-long wires are strung through the guns' trigger guards and locked on either end below the display, an effective and very necessary anti-theft measure.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • Fr. John+ 08/27/2011 12:27:00 PM

    I find the necessary inclusion of a very small minority (Jews, who make up less that 1.5% of Americans nation-wide) as a 'titillation factor' for your Uber-liberal readership, (as the 'hook' for getting some to read this article) to be very close to what the DFL and other mind-mumbed robots consider 'profiling.' What if Mr. Rothman had been an African-American, but a Tea Partier. Whoo-boy! You could have gone to town with that one! (But why?) The Second Amendment GUARANTEES the right to 'keep and bear arms.' End of story. But for those who WANT the Obamanation/Socialist Slagheap 'Paradise', such a thought is anathema. Then we look at the violence in Great Britain this summer, where no one but thugs and cops can have guns. Payback's a bitch, ain't it? Statistics have shown, for DECADES, that when lawful citizens have guns, CRIME GOES DOWN. And THAT's the only thing about 'Minnesota Nice' that I applaud- not the delusionary psycho-sexual fantasies of the Uber-Liberal Multicultimetrosexaul crowd. - Fr. John+

  • Alnrn78 06/14/2011 10:50:00 PM

    This article is way too long! it is filled with a lot of folksy conversation and almost no information regarding the title, Testing the gun show loophole. What a waste of time to read it! I got so bored I had to quit reading it 1/2 way through it.

  • 05/16/2011 10:15:00 PM

    What an ass. The sellers are all foul mouthed, pear shaped, liver spotted, harley riding, bearded white bigots. No wonder liberals annoy us so much. You just want to push 'em down and take their lunch money and send 'em running home crying to mommy. What liberal rag did this pap run in? Yawn.

  • Albert Nygren 08/15/2010 7:12:00 AM

    Your article is certainly slanted against gun owning and buying," Throwing stars arranged in a menacing and angular way". You speak of "gun show loop holes". There are no gun show loop holes. There is only a law that says a private citizen may sell another private citizen a firearm if they comply with the law. All of the people who have booths that sell guns at a gun show are people who have Federal Firearms Licenses to sell, and any person who buys a firearm from them must do all of the things anyone has to do when buying a firearm from a store. The entire ant-gun movement is based on a framework of lies. If they told the truth everyone could see that they are bogus.

  • arnold castro 07/18/2010 7:21:00 PM

    good day sir or ma,m can i ask a help about the shot gun that they gave to me its an minesota shot gun a bolt action, i think it was use in 2nd world war here in the pilipines some othere part are missing on the part mof the bolt or hammer can you pls help me so i can build it again? thank,s

  • Formo 06/07/2010 11:32:00 PM

    Nice work, Was expecting a hack job. Got much better. Still troubled that the author needed to call out the race of the buyers - just what did this have to do with anything? Since there were a lack of blacks, and yet many black criminals have guns, are we to infer that they do not buy them at guns shows and obtain them through illegal means (invalidating the entire gun show loophole argument)? Or are we to infer that only white men go to places where legal guns sales are the norm and illegal purchasers are shunned? You are headed in the right direction, but your biases are still showing.

  • Paul 06/07/2010 8:54:00 AM

    Nice work on the article! I rarely read city pages articles all the way through but this one was well written and researched. If the city pages had more articles that were objective like yours I would read it a lot more often.

  • Micah 06/07/2010 3:26:00 AM

    I'm shocked! I used to read the City Pages regularly and know it to be a paper that leans to the left on various issues, and most certainly on the gun control issue. I couldn't believe what I found. An article that accurately described what really goes on within the "gun community". I can only imagine what the members of Citizens for a Safer Minnesota were thinking when their false propaganda was put to the test...and failed. It's important to point out that Heather's issue isn't nearly as much of an issue as she would like to think. There are already plenty of laws on the books that prevent those without a FFL to sell to anyone that cannot legally buy or own a firearm. The current laws need to be enforced. And they are. There is absolutely no need for further legislation. The gun control nuts will never be happy with what's already in place. I applaud City Pages for running with the story anyways, even if the result wasn't what you (and others) were hoping for.

  • JOhnnie 06/07/2010 1:13:00 AM

    So help me understand, City Pages writers are all highly competent unless they tackle a subject in a way that pisses off the openly-biased 'editors' who manage the paper and the liberals who read it? Then the writers are incompetent hacks? Can't have it both ways folks.......

  • Susan Berkovitz 06/05/2010 5:36:00 AM

    Well, then how did Susan Berkovitz buy a .38 revolver at a Gun Show without a purchase permit, and shoot up the Hennepein County Court House? How did the Metro Gang Strike Force sell off it's arsenal of seized firearms? How did former Wyoming Police Chief Tony Pangal sell off the weapons in the Wyoming Police Department property room? The truth is, the worst offenders at the Gun Shows are law enforcement selling guns they stole from criminals, and didn't turn in. Metro Gang Task Force is a prime example. Over 1 million dollars of weapons sold, and put back on the street. Where did Israel Anderson's gun come from? So he could shoot a Minneapolis Cop in the foot? Poor Grosland. Never mind he can't walk right. Where did the Cop killer Jason John Jones get his guns? Well there are no criminals getting guns at Gun Shows. Tell that to Sgt. Joseph Bergerons family. IF you believe this BS in this article, go smoke some crack, do some X, and dream on. Susan Berkovitz

  • Erik Jensen 06/05/2010 2:00:00 AM

    Snyder's article was totally unenlightening. I'm an avid hunter and own seven firearms, and I have a practical, non-ideological view of them as tools. He failed to uncover the very real problem of the gun show loophole by going to gun shows and attempting to buy from only licensed dealers w/out a background check, instead of private sellers. He also didn't look into the problem of straw purchases much, which a number of gun dealers ignore or knowingly allow. Most importantly, he only (correctly) criticized the ideology of some non-gun owners: "guns are bad, period". He failed to shed light on the opposite problem of the NRA/gun rights movement's opposite ideology that "guns are good, period". This ideology leads to taking extreme positions regarding all gun regulations, even common sense rules to keep guns from crooks and unstable people. Practical firearms owners like myself were totally unrepresented in the article.

  • Joel Rosenberg 06/05/2010 12:38:00 AM

    Heather writes: This article doesn't explain the gun show loophole well. The gun show loophole is the gap in the law that allows "private sellers," people without a Federal license to sell guns, to conduct gun sales at gun shows without requiring a background check on the buyer. Heather is correct, although incomplete. She could have left out "at gun shows". The same laws apply there that apply, say, in the parking lot outside, in the coffeeshop nearby, and so forth. A suspicious guy would think that the Paymar bill, which Heather supports, really isn't about making sure that the small number of private sales at gun shows move from the gun show to the parking lot, but in the backdoor gun registration scheme embedded in it.

  • ConstitutionJIM 06/04/2010 9:56:00 PM

    Heather uses the term "unlicensed seller" the same way gun opponents use the word semi-automatic, i.e. purposefully turning it into a slur without even a shred of understanding what it all means.

  • Ratus 06/04/2010 4:52:00 AM

    "...somewhere between 30-50% of sellers at gunshows are unlicensed" You don't need a Federal Firearms License (FFL) to sell beef jerky, hats, t-shirts, books, knives, belts, boots or any of the thousands of other things that those "unlicensed sellers" have for sale.

  • Sparky 06/04/2010 3:16:00 AM

    Aggie, can you provide cites for your assertions. The original sources, please.

  • aggie 06/04/2010 3:03:00 AM

    Clearly Matt did not go far enough to find an unlicensed seller at the gun shows. They are there all right, Many of them- somewhere between 30-50% of sellers at gunshows are unlicensed. Some of them are responsible enough to ask about the permit to purchase and refuse to sell to someone like Matt who does not have one. That's the good news. The bad news is that the ATF estimates that as many as 30% of confiscated illegal guns have their source at a gun show. Guns don't fall from the sky. They all start out as legal purchases. So why make it easy for felons, domestic abusers and the seriously mentally ill to be able to walk into a gun show and purchase a lethal weapon? I'm just saying..... Matt needs to do a little more homework and talk to a few more people on the side of reasonable gun laws that won't affect law abiding citizens. Maybe he'll get his gun and then he will find that with rights come responsibilities- to store it safely and not bring it out in times of anger, depression, divorce or using alcohol or drugs. Good article as far as it went and a very good description of gun shows but I hope there is a follow-up article when Matt finds those unlicensed sellers at gun shows willing to sell to anyone.

  • Heather Martens 06/04/2010 1:49:00 AM

    This article doesn't explain the gun show loophole well. The gun show loophole is the gap in the law that allows "private sellers," people without a Federal license to sell guns, to conduct gun sales at gun shows without requiring a background check on the buyer. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has called gun shows a "major trafficking channel" and recommended closing the gun show loophole. The reporter went to a gun show and tried to buy a gun from more than one Federally licensed dealer without proof of having passed a local background check. Of course that didn't work. That's not where the loophole is. It is the UNlicensed seller who can sell without requiring a background check of the buyer. When the reporter came across a man wandering around with the AK-47 with a "for sale" sign on it, he does not seem to have recognized that person as likely to be an unlicensed seller, and he didn't ask to buy the weapon. Next time, I suggest he ask to buy the weapon. We have bought weapons, including a semi-automatic pistol and a Ruger Mini-14, from unlicensed sellers at gun shows without a background check. If you go to our web site, www.endgunviolence.com, you can watch a buyer purchasing a pistol from an unlicensed seller at a gun show in Forest Lake in exactly this way. Heather Martens, Citizens for a Safer Minnesota

  • Dan 06/04/2010 12:24:00 AM

    Very nice piece, and one hopes that Rep. Paymar attends a show sometime and does what Mr. Snyders did and actually talk to people. Gun owners/dealers are generally good natured and funny, but they know their shit when it comes to the law and they do not fuck around or put up with a lot of crap. Nobody understands what serious business this is like the people described in the article.

  • .45 Colt 06/04/2010 12:14:00 AM

    Snyders' "sense of place" and descriptions of people are quite realistic. His only failing is his inability to recognize the unlicensed gun sellers who also rent tables from the promoters, or perhaps it is simply lack of perserverance. Seek and ye shall find.

  • Sparky 06/03/2010 7:38:00 PM

    We'll see how long CP/VV lets this article sit on the front page of the web site. I bet that 'management' will be so hacked off at the tone of the article that they will push it off faster than a wet towel on a waterboarding subject.

  • John Caile 06/03/2010 7:10:00 PM

    What a refreshing change - a reporter who actually goes to the trouble of investigating the facts surrounding an issue! Too bad our "mainstream" newspapers have never taken the time to do anything remotely approaching the efforts of the City Pages writer Matt Snyders. Over the years I personally have invited numerous reporters to attend my carry permit classes, or just learn to shoot a handgun - surely they would want to at least get a smattering of understanding of such a significant issue. I was wrong. Then again, it is just such lazy (and often biased) journalism that has lead to much of the public's misunderstanding of issues related to guns and gun owners, including the persistence of the "gun show loophole" myth. Good job, Matt. John Caile www.sditraining.net

  • nathan 06/03/2010 8:44:00 AM

    When I saw this week's cover of City Pages I was a little worried that CP would once again put a spin on an issue just to fit a misinformed publics beliefs regarding guns. I was greatly relieved to read this article -- just one amidst all the other opposing media outlets -- that actually painted the vast majority of gun owners and dealers exactly how they are, law abiding citizens who believe that their rights to freedom begin with the ability to defend ones self. I am always surprised that those who oppose gun rights forget that a government who can take away this right can also take away other liberties: freedom of speech, religion, "freedom to disagree in general," etc. The right to defend oneself is also what protects our other civil liberties. Thank you, City Pages for not twisting the facts, but presenting gun owners, myself included, in a very fair, non-discriminatory manner.

  • David Hustvedt 06/03/2010 7:08:00 AM

    It is a Browning Buckmark, not Buckback.

  • Joel Rosenberg 06/03/2010 12:29:00 AM

    "When three black men enter the show at around 1 p.m., however, no one pays them much mind. Asked about their experience here, they seem more taken aback by the question's presumption than the surroundings." Damn. You got the wrong black guys. I know two who, I'm pretty sure, would have responded with a deadpan of something like, "Trouble? Nah," and, looking around, "now where am de white women?"

  • Paul 06/02/2010 8:58:00 PM

    I've gotta echo MBerg. When I checked the byline on page 2, I was shocked to see it was Snyders. Keep up the good work.

  • Chunkstyle 06/02/2010 8:24:00 PM

    Some problems with this article. There is no gun show "loophole". The name is completely wrong. In MN, there are gun sales through dealers, which almost all gun show sales are, and private sales. Both kinds can be done anywhere, with or without gun shows. What anti gun people really want to do is ban private sales everywhere, and make all sales go through dealers, at greater expense to all parties. But they hide it in "gun show loophole" rhetoric. What's more, almost no crime guns ever come from gun shows here, so it's really nothing whatever to do with crime. Second, this article goes from one paragraph explaining how concealing a gun is neither a requirement nor a crime in MN, to calling a permit to carry "conceal and carry". There is no permit to conceal here, if you can carry legally, you can do so openly or concealed, it's your choice. Our permits are not only for private citizens, but are also used to allow armed private security to carry. (Police, of course, need no permit.)

  • MBerg 06/02/2010 7:35:00 PM

    I've bagged on Matt Snyders' writing pretty consistently in the past, but fair is fair; this is an excellent, well-balanced piece.

  • Ruggy 06/02/2010 3:33:00 PM

    Kudos for the honest and entertaining article; you tell it like it is. Gun shows are filled with law abiding, responsible citizens.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy