Top

film

Stories

 

Coen brothers take A Serious Man into a truly vicious realm

This isn't your ordinary Coen-esque sadism

The Yiddish shtetl shtick that opens Joel and Ethan Coen's new movie—a Jewish peasant stumbles on an old Hasid who may or may not be an evil, soul-possessing dybbuk—is pretty clumsy, but at least it tips its hat to the great existential comedy that A Serious Man might have become if it wasn't buried beneath an avalanche of Ugly Jew iconography.

Even Job would sympathize: Michael Stuhlbarg (foreground) as Larry Gopnik
Wilson Webb
Even Job would sympathize: Michael Stuhlbarg (foreground) as Larry Gopnik

Details

A SERIOUS MAN
directed by Joel and Ethan Coen
Uptown Theatre, starts Friday

Related Content

More About

Set in 1967, in a Midwestern Jewish neighborhood with a strong resemblance to St. Louis Park, where the Coens grew up, A Serious Man is crowded with fat Jews, aggressive Jews, passive-aggressive Jews, traitor Jews, loser Jews, shyster-Jews, emo-Jews, Jews who slurp their chicken soup, and—passing as sages—a clutch of yellow-teethed, know-nothing rabbis. At their center is the beleaguered academic Larry Gopnik (played by the excellent stage actor Michael Stuhlbarg), a decent geek clinging desperately to his rapidly shredding status quo. Larry's wife, Judith (Sari Lennick), a stout matron with all her discontent lodged in her curled lip, announces that she's leaving him for Sy Ableman (Fred Melamed), a stuffed-shirt widower given to inflicting mandatory hugs on those he screws over. Larry's daughter (Jessica McManus) is filching money from Dad's wallet to pay for a nose job (now there's a novel gag); his son (Aaron Wolff) is strung out on television, Jefferson Airplane, and God knows what else while nominally preparing for his bar mitzvah; and Larry's chronically unemployed brother, Arthur (Richard Kind), sleeps on his couch. Meanwhile, just so you know that the Coens are equal-opportunity practitioners of the ethnic slur, Larry, who is up for tenure, is being set up by a Korean graduate student who talks funny and is unhappy with his failing grade. To cap it all, Larry's pneumatic pothead of a neighbor (Amy Landecker), the sole looker in sight and therefore probably a shiksa, provokes the only proactive behavior timid Larry is ever likely to take—in his dreams.

By way of plot, Larry suffers buckets of abuse from this crew, then seeks spiritual guidance where none is forthcoming until, either by accident or grand design, his life seems to get better all by itself.

If this were it, the movie would be no more than another dreary exercise in Coen brothers sadism. But the visual impact of all these warty, unappetizing Jews (even the movie's obligatory anti-Semite looks handsome by comparison) carries A Serious Man into the realm of the truly vicious. The production notes are larded with the Coens' disclaiming protestations of affection for their hapless characters, but make no mistake: We're being invited to share in their disgust.

And God help the rube who can't take the joke.

I try not to second-guess my colleagues, but would this desire to be hip be why I'm hearing comparisons to Philip Roth, one of the world's least self-hating Jews if you read him right? Would this be why, in a poll conducted by Indiewire at this year's Toronto Film Festival, critics—among them many Jews—voted A Serious Man their best film? They're entitled, but I worry (especially given the indifferent shrug with which the North American film fraternity greeted British director Ken Loach's vile comments earlier this summer that, in light of Gaza, a rise in anti-Semitism is "understandable") about what ancient anxieties lie behind the endorsement of a movie that dumps on Jews and Judaism with such ferocity.

In a fleeting gesture toward the sublime, Larry is seen frantically scribbling mathematical formulae on a blackboard for his students. The camera pulls away to reveal the entire board covered in figures and symbols that strive to master the uncertainty principle, which happens to be generating extreme emotional weather for the troubled prof on the home front. When man makes plans and they fizzle, is that God or the Devil laughing, or the randomness of a world without meaning? A Serious Man might have shown us at our funniest, most abject, and most endearing, when we look in vain for answers to our common hurts and losses. As usual, though, the Coens have more venal satisfactions in mind. "The fun of the story for us," they crow in the notes for this loathsome movie, "was inventing new ways to torture Larry." Is A Serious Man a work of Jewish self-loathing? Hard to tell, if only because—aside from Fargo's Marge Gunderson, one of the great creations of American cinema—just about every character the Coens create is meant to affirm their own superiority. 

 
  • David Howe 10/20/2009 3:50:00 AM

    Regarding the review itself: This is one of the most tone-deaf things I've read this side of Armond White. Yikes, what a mess. Further, it should be noted that no work of art has any obligation whatsoever to fulfill any social or political ideology. The fact that this film does not flatter Jews (according to an extant yet undefined criteria) is not a question of quality. As for this quote: "especially given the indifferent shrug with which the North American film fraternity greeted British director Ken Loach's vile comments earlier this summer that, in light of Gaza, a rise in anti-Semitism is "understandable"" Fair enough, but who exactly is the "North American film fraternity" and what exactly did you expect them to do in light of Loach's remarks? You mistake a ill-defined (by you) confederation for a formal organization with a public relations procedure at its disposal. If you are genuinely interested in this topic, behave like a journalist and go ask some members (or all of them) for their response. Speculation is not appropriate. Implying approval by the silence that only you can hear is appalling.

  • Nora Plesofsky 10/09/2009 1:27:00 AM

    Ella got this wrong. A Serious Man is actually a loving portrayal of the foibles and ridiculousness of Jews we have all known and recognize. This is the essence of Jewish humor.

  • kris jacobs 10/04/2009 12:42:00 AM

    Satire: look it up.

  • Richard Lead 10/02/2009 8:21:00 PM

    Honestly, this review IS CRACKED. Did anyone, like, read over this thing? Were some paragraphs accidentally deleted? It feels like something is missing and that, without said something, we just have tenuous assertions, only vaguely connected to each either and to the film they supposedly describe. It's hard to even know where to begin unpacking the myriad baseless assumptions that ground Taylor's hatchet job, but for starters, how about the idea that any piece of film criticism should deal with at least one formal feature of the work in question--e.g. shots, cuts, genre--in short, with stylistic concerns? Then, you can link these concerns to thematic and narrative elements, and in so doing, develop an idea about what it is that a given film does, which you can then proceed to evaluate? This review, on the other hand, attempts a dismissal of the Coen brothers' entire oeuvre based on the principle that the reviewer finds their characters generally unlikable. Moreover, while it is true that the Coens "might have shown us at our funniest, most abject, and most endearing, when we look in vain for answers to our common hurts and losses," as Taylor emotes, why, indeed, should they show us in such a way? This is the stuff of the saccharine, the sentimental, the second-rate. The thing to do would be to ask why they do not portray us in this mendacious manner, and then to connect that question with something concrete about the film. If you want to take down the local favorites, bring a little more substance.

  • mudhenmike@yahoo.com 10/02/2009 4:17:00 PM

    What a terrible review. I can't for the life of me recall anything I've read (review or otherwise) in this lousy rag that I've found useful in anyway in the last eight years. I will pick up the City Pages only to use it to get my fire started.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Most Popular Stories

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy