Top

news

Stories

 

Holly Ann Collins faces new custody dispute

After returning from 14 years of hiding in Amsterdam and resolving her kidnapping case, the expat mother faces a new legal challenge

Just a few weeks after Holly Collins returned to the Netherlands, thinking that she would never have to set foot in Minnesota again, her son, nicknamed "Chip," opened the door of their small home in western Holland and was served legal papers.

Collins's voice shakes as she translates the document from Dutch to English over the phone. According to the Order for Enforcement, the 15-year-old and his mother are to appear in Hennepin County Judge Charles A. Porter's courtroom today for yet another hearing. After more than a decade of having no contact with him, Chip's father, Jeff Imm of Zimmerman, wants the boy back.

That night Chip, faced with the fear of being shipped back to a country he has never known and to a father he has no memory of, couldn't sleep. "He was crying," says Collins. "He kept saying, 'He won't even visit me and now he is going to rip me out of my school and my family.' He said, 'Mom, if they take me, can I bring my dog?'"

As she talks, Chip interrupts: "I called him 27 times," the teenager says in the background. (Because he is still under 18, Collins did not allow her son to talk to the press.)

Holly Collins has a long and tangled history with the Hennepin County Family Court, stretching back to the early 1990s when, after a brutal court battle, she lost custody of the two children she had with her ex-husband, Mark Collins.

After the children claimed abuse at the hands of their father, Collins defied the court and fled with them to the Netherlands in June 1994. She took Chip, who was a baby at the time, along with her.

"What was she going to do with the baby, abandon him?" asks her lawyer, Alan Rosenfeld. "The child wasn't at risk of abuse from Jeff, but Holly was the primary parent taking care of him, and the best thing was clearly to take him with. At the time she had legal and physical custody—the courts granted her that."

Earlier that year, Collins had been awarded full physical custody of the infant by Hennepin County Family Court, says Rosenfeld. Separated from Mark Collins in 1987, Holly had her third child with Imm in March 1993. At the time of the birth, Imm wasn't interested in custody, Rosenfeld says. The father was ordered to pay child support amounting to $4,800 a year, totaling $60,000 so far.

Imm did not return phone calls seeking comment. His lawyer, Valerie Arnold of Tuff & Arnold Law Offices in Maplewood, had little to say about the case.

"This is a tragic situation," Arnold wrote in an email. "Mr. Imm, as the father of the minor child, feels that having this private family matter covered by the media is not in the best interests of his son."

When Collins and the baby disappeared, Imm went before Judge Porter seeking a new ruling. Porter reversed custody to Imm, but ordered the father continue to pay child support in his son's absence—the money would go into a trust fund for the child, and could be used to try to locate Chip, though that is no longer necessary.

In 1997 Collins and the children were granted asylum in the Netherlands, where they lived in hiding for the last 14 years. Late last month, Collins accepted a plea bargain with Hennepin County, which agreed to drop the kidnapping charges in exchange for a lesser plea to contempt of court. She served her sentence of 40 hours of community service and is currently residing in the Netherlands.

Neither Collins nor Chip will attend Wednesday's hearing, says Rosenfeld. Collins only recently returned to the Netherlands and it's just not practical to arrange travel back to the States on such short notice.

"I can't really characterize what they are doing in court as anything other than holding their breath and stomping their feet," Rosenfeld says of the court order. "It's very childish of them. Sending the house a legal document demanding the kid be uprooted from his home, yanked away from the mother, brothers and sisters he loves, the country he lives in. None of that is something you rationally do if you want to build a relationship...I don't know how they could ever make an argument that this is in the best interest of the child."

For months now, Rosenfeld says, he has been working with the Imm family through their lawyer to restore the relationship between Chip and his father. Originally, when Rosenfeld thought the kidnapping case would go to trial, he planned visitation between the father and son during the time the family would be in Minnesota. But when Collins was offered the plea agreement, "the situation had changed," Rosenfeld says. "If Holly lived here it would be much easier, but she's in Holland...[Imm] is going to have to travel and he's going to have to make some effort."

Rosenfeld doubts that Wednesday's court hearing will result in Collins losing her son. For Imm to get actual custody, he would have to travel to the Netherlands and appeal the case in the Dutch courts.

"They say they want actual custody, but the judge in Minnesota doesn't have the power or authority to give [Imm] that," says Rosenfeld. "They have to go to the Netherlands to decide whether or not [Chip] should be sent back."

 
  • Silvereyes1945 07/08/2011 10:06:00 PM

    "The entire problem with this is documented in the three posts below. People have a one sided mind set to side with the mom or side with the dad." And it's clear you side with the dad. You are no different. "The fact is that at the time she left the country with Chip, she had full custody that wasn't fully decided yet." Jeff Imm moved to England before Holly left with the kids. He did not ask for any kind of custody or visitation. Instead, the judge gave him supervised visitation by default. Jeff Imm never exercised his visitation rights. Jeff Imm only asked for custody AFTER Holly left with the children as a ploy to end his child support obligation. "She also had two other children from her ex-husband that she kidnapped as well. Her intent was to "save" her children and to not allow the kids to be abused anymore. That's great, but you can't go around breaking the law either" Slavery was legal in this country at one time. Yet, people broke the law to rescue them. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's moral. Holly exhausted all her legal appeals. If the kids were truly being abused (and I think they were), Holly had a moral obligation to protect those children when the law refused to do so. "and if you're picking abusive men to father your children who are as deviant at she claims, maybe she should re-evaluate." Holly did re-evaluate. That's why she and her children were safe in the Netherlands all these years. "She was found by two different doctors to have Munchausen syndrome by proxy" Holly was never specifically diagnosed with this disorder BY ANYONE. Susan De Vries, a court appointed therapist for the children, suggested this case reminded her of information she read on Munchausen syndrome by proxy (a whole six articles). Susan De Vries had no personal experience with Munchausen syndrome by proxy and never evaluated, nor treated anyone with the disorder. That's like a dentist diagnosing someone with lung cancer just because they read a text book on the subject. In fact, Julia Davis, another court appointed therapist for Holly, said she was distressed that the court was treating Holly like she had this order when NO ONE specifically diagnosed her with Munchausen syndrome by proxy. In fact, Judge Davis, who gave custody to the father, admitted that Holly was never diagnosed with a personality disorder after she and her children were located after 14 years in the Netherlands. "Is what Mr. Imm doing right now at this point in Chips life the smart thing to do?" You don't uproot a 15 year old from the only family and country he has ever known no matter what happened between the parents years before. Jeff Imm travels frequently to europe for his job. He could've visited Chip numerous times, but he refused because he doesn't want to pay child support. That speaks volumes right there what Imm really cares about. "What got me about this article is when Chip shouted out from another room the exact number of times that he called his father. That just seemed like it was planted in his mind over a period of time have 16 year old and a 15 year old sons both honors kids fortunately and they couldn't quote an exact number for anything from how much gas they put in the car to how much they spent at the movies much less how many times they call me in the series of a day....week or month." Or maybe they don't care how many times they call you because it sounds like they see you on a regular basis. It's a whole 'nother ball game when you are forced to call a father repeatedly and beg him to visit you when he could care less. Btw, Jennifer even called her father, and he hung up on her after telling her she was "14 years too late" . Yeah, this was a guy who cared about not seeing his kids all these years. Mark Collins and Jeff Imm should be ashamed of themselves. Oh, well, Holly married a dutchman and had 4 more kids while in the Netherlands. Unfortunately, they are now divorced, but Holly remains on good terms with him. Her dutch ex-husband plans to adopt Chip as his own even though he and Holly are now divorced. Jennifer and Zachary credit this man for showing them how a real father should be. This guy even offered to drive Chip to Germany to visit Jeff Imm when Imm was there on business. Imm refused because he didn't want to pay child support. Children don't need fathers like Mark Collins or Jeff Imm.

  • Understandingisn'tagreeing 06/02/2011 3:54:00 AM

    The entire problem with this is documented in the three posts below. People have a one sided mind set to side with the mom or side with the dad. The fact is that at the time she left the country with Chip, she had full custody that wasn't fully decided yet. She also had two other children from her ex-husband that she kidnapped as well. Her intent was to "save" her children and to not allow the kids to be abused anymore. That's great, but you can't go around breaking the law either and if you're picking abusive men to father your children who are as deviant at she claims, maybe she should re-evaluate. What's not said in this article is that nearly two dozen professionals, doctors, courthands, advocates, Holly's own family members say that the accounting of the events she highlights lack credit. Holly compounded all these "abuses" yet everyone from the CPS to the FBI and Courts did all they could to investigate and there were no finding of abuse of the Collin's children. She was found by two different doctors to have Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Even after those two diagnosis, Holly claimed to still be "looking" for a doctor to "properly" diagnose her. Is what Mr. Imm doing right now at this point in Chips life the smart thing to do? I guess you can leave that up to the magnitude of critics out there. Some people say, better late than never, others say it's too late dude and yet others say to never stop fighting for your children. Bottomline, what she did was wrong. Wrong is wrong. If there were no indications of abuse of the Collin's children and then no chance for Chip to even get to know his father, physically, then to say it's not fair is stating the obvious. The most damning thing I think here is not what's coming out of Holly's mouth because I can't sit here and believe a word she says when not even her own family does. What got me about this article is when Chip shouted out from another room the exact number of times that he called his father. That just seemed like it was planted in his mind over a period of time. I have 16 year old and a 15 year old sons both honors kids fortunately and they couldn't quote an exact number for anything from how much gas they put in the car to how much they spent at the movies much less how many times they call me in the series of a day....week or month. Bomb me all you want...that's just me and my personal experience.

  • Rhys 01/21/2011 12:03:00 AM

    and here we have a prime example of an emotionally charged person who has obviously not done their research into the matter. Several doctors testified in court that she has a psychological condition called Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy. This is a condition, were the victim exaggerates minor medical and health problems, making them seem much bigger than they actually are. Hell, the court even sent a doctor to check up on the kids,and he reported that they were perfectlyhealthy, with no trace of abuse. Also, Doctors have ruled that the children's health was actualy improving during the time spent with their father, and was degrading during the time with their mother. I'm not saying that the boy should be taken away from his mother, after he has grown up with them for so long, but I definitely think the mother should have at least been charged with fines. source: http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/?p=1267

  • cara 09/30/2009 8:01:00 PM

    Yeah no power for the farher to emotionally and physically abuse the children! I am so sick of hearing that fathers are gaining custody just because they show an interest in court. The only reason they want custody is to get back at the mother, to control, and not pay support.Most of the time that is true. People who work for the court will make their own assumptions and side with fathers who appear to have some interest in the child/children. It is so sad, it is not fair to just say that Holly was lying about abuse. I think she did the right thing in moving fair away from that f@#$ing creep. More power to her. And that guy who wants custody of her 15 year old boy wants sympathy and media attention. its Horseshit!!

  • Mike 12/05/2008 3:17:00 AM

    Mothers can do whatever they want and the courts will not hold them accountable most of the time. It was wrong for her to take that child and flee the country. The court awarded custody to the father but she decided to do her own thing and defy the father and the court. It would be nice if the were held accountable for her actions, but she won't be. Women almost ALWAYS claim abuse in divorce cases. It's a tactic used by women's divorce attornies. Everone knows it, everone admits it but nothing is done about it. The men are guilty until proven innocent. I'm tired of seeing perfectly innocent, decent men abused by the courts because unstable women use abuse as a tool to get their children. Even when the court doesn't buy it and awards the fathers custody, then the women take the children and flee....the fathers are still left with no access to the children. It's a shame.

  • Judy 10/19/2008 9:47:00 AM

    Oh for heaven's sake - let it go! The Courts love to use their power for their own glory. What good will come from tearing a 15 year old boy from the only family he's known, from his home, from his school, from his friends, from his dog? The Courts must act in the best interest of the child, not some guy who didn't even try to find him for 15 years. Mr.Imm if you want to meet your son go to him don't force him to come to you. He will only resent you anyway.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy