Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

National Features >

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

Austin Dacey

Share

  • rss

By Ben Palosaari

Published on April 17, 2008 at 3:20am

The Secular Conscience by well-known atheist and philosopher Austin Dacey makes a couple of interesting arguments about morals and their origin. Dacey proclaims that—gasp!—you don't need religion to have a moral base and a conscience. He also says that—double gasp!—religion should not be done away with, and it in fact belongs in the public discourse about morals. His book is gaining admiration from both religious scholars and atheist philosophers. His religious fans like him for respecting their beliefs, and the secularists enjoy his steadfast argument that non-religious people do have a conscience. If you can cut through some of the pretentious and verbose language (he is, after all, a philosopher), Dacey makes points worth contemplating regardless of your faith. He pulls current stories from the news about where secularists are forgetting their fundamental beliefs. Like a less-hated Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens, he outlines his own reasons for not believing in a supreme being. Some of these arguments are threadbare atheist standbys, but Dacey succeeds at punctuating old atheist complaints with new pieces of information and studies. The result is that his book is pretty friendly toward religious readers, and he gives the atheist arguments a slight facelift.
Sun., April 20, 2 p.m., 2008