By Jeff Gage
By Rob van Alstyne
By Jeff Gage
By Youa Vang
By Dave King
By Rob van Alstyne
By CP Staff
By Youa Vang
It's easy to mistake Fischerspooner's plundering of early electro-pop as a superficial trope on '80s boredom and malaise. Actually, it's much deeper: They don't just talk about it, they embody it.
Back when punk bands became "new wave" bands by substituting keyboards for guitars and drum machines for drums, the transition wasn't necessarily reactionary. Emergent post-punk bands like Tubeway Army and the Human League went electronic with an intuition that the alien timbres of electronic instruments could better express the nihilistic themes of punk that were already wearing thin by the dawn of the '80s--the fatal contradiction of punk being that a completely nihilistic group of goombahs at least cared enough about something to put flesh to metal and wood, rather than just offing themselves, as the lyrics liked to threaten.
Punk's contradiction was resolved in new-wave synth-rock, the ambivalent sound of unevocative keyboard burble, robotic sequencing, and affectless vocalizing. In punk, there was a troubling constant: the warm gesture of hand hitting guitar, the moist distortion from a singer so eager to get it all out he's practically fellating the microphone. But with the muted attack of new wave's synthesizers and the calm regularity of its drum programming, human gesture was gone, negated. What was left was a true void--vague lyrics slowly falling through an imagined space like half-deflated balloons, a universe of symbols completely disconnected from their creators.
New wave's birth was a pragmatic solution to an artistic conundrum, a happenstance crossroad between the art and technology of the time. Its subsequent commercialization was aided by the fact that cheap synthesizers were now everywhere, which allowed punk's dark tendencies to slip into popular culture like a chump with a fake passport. America's ears were already attuned. At the same time, though, punk was reuniting with its long-lost gay father, Romanticism, and each would be baffled by the resemblance between them, if secretly questioning the provenance.
This is the history that Fischerspooner seems to be mining.
A thumbnail sketch will tell you what you need to know about Fischerspooner with some thumbnail to spare. They're sort of a cosmopolitan version of Insane Clown Posse, a hazy collective of dancers and multimedia dilettantes headed by ex-art-school dudes Warren Fischer and Casey Spooner. Sonically, their record is a tepid broth of recycled bass-synth ostinatos and ineffectual disco vocals, flavored with electronica's equivalent of salt and pepper--digital vocoder and Roland Space Echo. Live, though, their makeup-reeking histrionics successfully channel the aesthetics of MTV's early days, when video seemed to imbue the most mundane gestures with an otherworldly mystery (for example, David Byrne's spastic hand-jive in "Once in a Lifetime," or Adam Ant's Brigadoon-on-Quaaludes antics). FS flog the dead horse of postmodernity by refusing to acknowledge anything besides the rotting artifacts of the past. Yet, at the same time, they unwittingly posit a much more interesting idea, which is that you can never enter the same cultural river twice.
But an interesting idea doesn't necessarily produce good art, which makes it really difficult to talk about Fischerspooner's debut, #1 (Capitol), in any serious way. By that, I mean the music, not the stage show or the cover art or Electroshock at large. Sometimes boring records can short-circuit your brain like this: If there's nothing going on musically, then what ephemeral notion are people responding to when they listen to the stuff? On what strange fiction is its popularity predicated? Now we're in the realm of cultural anthropology, hacking our way through other people's inner worlds with a dull machete, and that's problematic even when you're thinking about something as relatively stable as Star Trek porn. I watched FS on Last Call with Carson Daly, and their performance-art routine was so mind-numbingly pretentious it actually took me aback for a minute. Too bad there are no instructions on their record for how to bring the spectacle home with you. Even a package of Sea Monkeys tells you how to do that.
So we're left with the music, as inert and inscrutable as it is. Fine, then. This is a pop act that's defined by its frenzy of appropriation, sifting through junk culture in an attempt to find meaning, while ambivalent toward the meaning that the sifting itself has created. But sometimes history talks back.
The most notable moment on Fischerspooner's album--an otherwise tedious sleepwalk of a record--is their cover of Wire's "The 15th," from the latter's 1979 album 154. This isn't surprising: Fischerspooner is riding the post-9/11 zeitgeist of New York City, a town that, once a horse's nose ahead of the rest of the world in rock innovation, is now retreating into its past with an avant-garde-scaled vigor for post-punk nostalgia. Fittingly, #1 is a thrift-store romp through musical kitsch history, not born of notions of "credibility" or even of escapism, but of garden-variety boredom.
Neither Wire nor Fischerspooner is particularly romantic, in the new-wave, plaster-gargoyle-store sense of the word. The studioesque sound of Wire's 154 was initially criticized as being too "cold" in comparison to the woolly timbre of their debut LP, Pink Flag. And FS's face-value take on Wire's "The 15th" is staunchly unromantic. To them, Wire weren't too cold--they were too human. Wire's midwifing of punk values via expensive technology--their brilliantly simple idea that the artful employment of machines best expresses the malaise of humans in a mechanistic world--is now fed through a methodology that is itself yawningly mechanistic.