By Alan Scherstuhl
By Mark Holcombe
By Scott Foundas
By Nick Pinkerton
By Michael Atkinson
By Scott Foundas
By Keith Phipps
By Alan Scherstuhl
Like life, a movie represents a series of choices made according to what's available: There's the crucial question of what to shoot, of course, but also how to shoot it, where to shoot it, whether to move the camera (and how), when to cut, what to put on the soundtrack, and what to call it when it's done. In a way, any piece of film is most alive in the editing, before it's strapped to the movie's final structure--because then, seemingly, anything is possible. (Even the industry's utilitarian terminology can't fail to convey the freedom and confinement involved in the different stages of post-production: The miles of raw footage are known as "rushes" while a fully edited picture is regarded as "locked.") If a finished movie lives--and lives differently--in the minds of all who see it, there's an equal sense in which the final product is utterly dead to its creator.
Then there's the ordinary person who, as the saying goes, "lives his life like he's in a movie": the performing "artist" (or "drama queen") who has a thing for soap opera, an acute awareness, perhaps, of the gravity of all those choices. And let me tell you, it's a tough way to live. Yet one could argue that the decisions one makes in the act of artistic creation are infinitely more profound--and painful--than those one makes in life, because art lives forever. (Whereas no one--except maybe the judge in Defending Your Life--is apt to remember that you pitched a rock through that car window in second grade.) The much-abused privilege of the "director's cut" notwithstanding, the completed movie endures long past the life of its maker, and once "locked" can never be altered. To a director, that's a heavy thought indeed--and I haven't even mentioned love. Unbridled passion would seem an essential element of anything worth making (love included), although the paradox of both love and movies is that to "consummate" an affair or a film is to bring it to fruition--and thereby, as the word suggests, to use it up.
All of which is a long way of saying that Wong Kar-wai's In the Mood for Love is a movie about art and life and love, because it's explicitly about choices: the seemingly infinite number of them, and the weight of each. And the romance of putting them off until later. And the lament for all that's lost once one of them is made. (Not for nothing is one scholarly essay on Wong's films titled "The Erotics of Disappointment.") Where Wong's Happy Together concerned a couple who were anything but, In the Mood for Love follows two would-be lovers who are unhappy apart: a journalist (Tony Leung) and a secretary (Maggie Cheung), both married to other people, who masochistically ponder their mutual attraction after bumping into one another in a cramped Hong Kong apartment building circa 1962. Aside from this initially divine meeting of souls, fate doesn't much enter into it: Rather, Wong's is a film about love in the absence of destiny--in the face, that is, of endless longing, limited options, and impossible decisions.
Throughout, the director's precisely measured deployment of light, color, movement, sound, and music--so many choices, so little time--makes his own deliberations palpable. (That shot of Cheung's forlorn beauty swaying her hips and swinging a thermos full of noodles looks even more gorgeous in slow-mo, yes?) In turn, we come to see that courtship, too, is an art. About a half-hour into Mood, Chow Mo-wan (Leung) and Su Li-zhen (Cheung) are walking home together after drinking tea in a café, having just confirmed their suspicions that their spouses are having an affair. "I wonder how it began," Li-zhen muses, setting another affair in (slow-)
motion. Mo-wan gently reaches for her wrist and, cradling it in his hand, asks, "Shall we stay out tonight?"--replaying what her husband might have said to Mo-wan's wife. Then, a moment later, in Li-zhen's (or Wong's?) hypothetical variation on the earlier proposal, she playfully twirls a finger in the general direction of where Mo-wan's belt meets the bottom of his tie, and blushes. Are the two seeking to discover how they were first cheated upon? Are they getting revenge? Falling for each other? All of the above? Besides performing their spouses' roles, the betrayed spouses--themselves played by two of the most beautiful stars in the known universe--are likely enacting their own desires, and ours.
In the Mood for Love is, hands down, the sexiest movie I've ever seen--and there's not a single sex scene in it. Whether it's Wong or the protagonists who keep the affair unconsummated onscreen (we'll never know), the director nonetheless relishes its sensual minutiae: Li-zhen's alluring wardrobe of high-collared, tight-fitting floral print cheongsams (her person, like her passion, pushing the bounds of societal stricture); a lush, lilting Nat King Cole tune ("Quizás, Quizás, Quizás"--meaning maybe, maybe, maybe) that literally teases with possibility; a piece of rare steak dipped in a spicy mustard sauce, its yellow as hot as the kind of kiss you taste for days. As in the deepest love, the film's true feelings are communicated without words: Just after the secret admirers have brushed past each other on a narrow stairway, the image of rain falling beneath a street lamp comes like a tiny orgasm or a drizzle of tears. The overripe array of reds, golds, greens, purples, and pinks in the mise en scène--sometimes all in a single shot--is enough to make you swoon.
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city