Last October Ario Nikpai thought he had landed his dream job. The Armenian native and University of Minnesota math and education graduate had been hired to teach at St. Paul's Minnesota Technology High School--a year-old experimental institution offering an avant-garde hybrid of liberal-arts education and high-tech training. The school, located in St. Paul's Midway neighborhood even had a catchy, classics-meet-cyberspace mantra: "Plato with a laptop!"
Minnesota Technology was excited to employ Nikpai, too: He was a Minnesota-certified math teacher who had taught at both Osseo High School and Patrick Henry High School in Minneapolis. In a letter of recommendation, the charter high school's lead teacher wrote: "Mr. Nikpai is highly qualified for this position....We are eager to gain the employment of Mr. Nikpai at the earliest date possible."
Barely three months later, however, the 52-year-old teacher and his employer had parted ways on less than amicable terms. Nikpai says that during his short tenure at Minnesota Technology he was ostracized by other teachers and occasionally asked to do "custodial work"--assemble furniture, clean up after a graduation party--even though he had a medically diagnosed back condition. The relationship deteriorated, he alleges, when he questioned some of the school's management practices, including its hiring of teachers who did not hold Minnesota licenses.
"Would you go under surgery with an uncertified surgeon?" he asks sarcastically. "No [teacher] should go to a high school without certification. It's a basic right of the student."
Minnesota Technology fired Nikpai in mid-January, and on March 30 he filed a lawsuit in Ramsey County District Court against the school and its superintendent, Wayne Jennings, for discrimination, breach of contract, and defamation. It was the loudest salvo yet in a long-simmering dispute: In recent months a number of teachers and parents have lodged complaints about Minnesota Technology with the school's governing board as well as its sponsoring institution, Inver Hills Community College, and the State of Minnesota. At the heart of the dispute, say those involved, is a simple question: Just how far can experimental public schools push the regulatory envelope?
In 1991 Minnesota made national headlines when it became the first state to allow private organizations to start and run public "charter" schools, as long as they could find an educational institution or school district to sponsor them. According to the University of Minnesota's Center for School Change, more than 60 charters now operate statewide; most are small institutions run by groups of teachers and parents. Minnesota Technology has an estimated 85 students and is operated by a nonprofit educational consulting firm, Designs for Learning, founded in 1987 by Wayne Jennings, a former St. Paul schools administrator.
Though charter schools are funded by tax dollars, they are exempt from many of the state regulations governing regular public schools. One rule they do have to follow, however, is the state statute requiring teachers to hold a valid license. Under Minnesota law, explains Michael Tillmann, executive director of the Minnesota Board of Teaching, schools wishing to hire an unlicensed teacher must petition the board and prove "hardship"; the board can then grant a provisional or limited license.
DCFL records indicate, however, that only two of the school's nine teachers teach subjects for which they are licensed, and five teachers hold no license at all. One of the unlicensed instructors is a University of Minnesota freshman who began teaching networking and other computer courses when he was still a senior at Minnetonka High School. The teacher, Bill Oyler, declined to comment, as did a number of other current and former Minnesota Technology staffers contacted for this story.
Wayne Jennings, the Designs for Learning founder, who also serves as superintendent of Minnesota Technology, says his school is not breaking the law: The unlicensed faculty members, he explains, are not actually considered teachers, but "community experts" who work under close supervision. "We are using a model called differentiated staffing," Jennings explains. "We work as a team. The licensed teachers are ultimately in charge."
Not so, says Paul Perkal, who taught computer courses at Minnesota Technology without a license until late January, when he was fired. "I was thrown into one class that I didn't have the knowledge to teach," Perkal asserts. "You're much more on your own than even a licensed teacher in a [noncharter] public school. There is no supervision. There is no oversight."
Minnesota Technology's charter agreement with Inver Hills Community College specifies that the school "shall employ and contract with necessary teachers who hold valid licenses to perform the particular service for which they are employed." But Bruce Lindberg, dean of business at Inver Hills and the college's liaison to the charter school, maintains that it's not the sponsor's job to monitor hiring practices. "That's between the school and the state," he says.
Cindy Lavorato, assistant commissioner of management services at the Department of Children, Families and Learning, says her agency has "limited control" over charter schools and refers questions on licensing to the state board of teaching. Board director Tillmann says he isn't aware of any complaints about Minnesota Technology teachers.
Lavorato says her department is investigating one complaint against Minnesota Technology; she won't discuss details of the inquiry, but many of the school's former teachers believe it concerns the handling of individual education programs (IEPs)--the records documenting each student's needs. Perkal says that during his tenure at Minnesota Technology he never knew how to help his special-ed students because their records were not available.