Touch of the Witch

WHAT WITCHES ARE good at is transformation. At its highest level, witch-power is transformative power. But the word "power" is always a problem. When tribal people use it, they mean a force accessible to humans that comes directly from the non-human--from the Dreamtime, Australians call it. The Other World. Or from animals, plants, rocks, waters, clouds. To posit such a power is to imagine humanity as not entirely of this world, the world of daily life, or the Other; it is to imagine us, rather, as a living gate between this world and worlds beyond. As though humanity were the very membrane through which what we now call "information" passes between the worlds--information, in this case, being force, energy, a kind of wind, through which come messages, healings, destructions, visions, transformations. Witches, when they know they're witches (many don't), are people who can consciously place themselves at this gateway or passageway; take responsibility for being there; and never forget the great law or truth that makes transformation in this realm possible: that this world and the Other World are dependent upon each other.

That is one of the central messages of the old tales. The queen of the faerie realm is always standing by a well or a stream in need of someone from this world--sometimes a warrior, sometimes a tailor, sometimes a queen of this world, but someone with skills here that are needed in a world beyond. Or the journeyer--the princess of this world exiled from her kingdom, the boy whose stepmother tried to eat him--suddenly comes upon a bird with a human head, or a talking horse, because the journeyer is in need of a message from the Other World in order to get through the forest. The old tales trace an interlocking structure between the two worlds, and assume that the world we live in and the world beyond must freshen and restore each other.

Many of the religious practices of indigenous peoples (including the indigenous peoples of Europe) were rituals by which this world passed sustenance to the next, and called for sustenance in return. They were and are religions of constant give-and-take between the worlds. With a few, such as the Aztecs, this was done violently, but that was rare; for the most part, this exchange of sustenance was attempted simply, peacefully, reverently, though always with awe and alertness, for it can be a trembling moment, standing at the gateway between worlds. The means to do this is the "craft" of "witchcraft"--a word given a bad spin by those gradually dominant religions concerned more with dominance than religion (which killed millions of indigenous witches in homage to their own rather selfish gods).

The witch's bad image is not helped much by the old tales. As anyone who's read the Grimm collection (the most popular of these tales) knows, both their strength and weakness are their stark metaphors. The dark side of motherhood becomes the evil stepmother. The blind spots of love become the irrational, dangerous demands that lovers make of each other. Inner growth becomes the journey through the dark forest. And, to set them apart from others, those with witch-power become hairy, troll-like, have teeth like tusks or nails like claws--metaphors, verbal special-effects, for humans in a state of profound transformation, of this world and not of this world both. (I suspect one reason for this is to avoid making witch-power seductive; to let folks know that transformation is serious business.)

The witch, as Robert Bly has pointed out, is crucial to the tale: The journeyer must go to the witch, the transformer, for instruction on transformation. He or she will then be given a task that seems crazy or impossible, and through that task will break through to another state of being. Again, the witch is portrayed as dangerous because transformation from one level of consciousness to another is not to be taken lightly, and can call for what seems crazy or even impossible. The weakness of the tales is that the starkness of their metaphors may be taken literally. As with the metaphors of the Bible, this leaves them open to misreadings and attacks. (For this reason, Buddha and the Taoists kept metaphors to a minimum.)

But leaving aside spiritual politics; leaving aside, too, the cartoon of the witch embedded in our imaginations by a parade of trivializations, propaganda against do-it-yourself spirituality; and leaving aside, ever so gingerly, the fear at the root of such trivializing, the fear that the gateway between this world and the Dreamtime is everywhere, and thus nothing may be what it seems--leaving all that aside, there remain the very human, all too human, people who are susceptible to, and have a talent for, this world of transformations: the witches themselves.

Many don't know they're witches--that is, don't know that they're more susceptible than others to the gateways between daily time and the Dreamtime; don't know that the extremes they feel within themselves are capacities for transformation. In other eras, in which these knowledges were more common--"Once upon a time, when wishing still helped," is how the first Grimm tale says that--the community was on the lookout for such people, knew their value as seers and healers and protectors, and when they saw what have been called "wild talents" in a young person, that person was set apart and apprenticed to an elder who knew the way of such things. But our high schools don't do this.

Next Page »